History · Columbia University
Professor Lightfoot is an incredible lecturer. She distills an incredibly complex and varied history of an entire region into digestible content for non-history majors. She is knowledgeable, personable, and approachable, and its clear that she has spent a lot of time and effort perfecting the structure of this course. I would definitely recommend this class to anyone interested in Caribbean history or in thinking about oppression, resistance, and revolution throughout history. Starting with the trans-Atlantic slave trade and ending with current issues facing the Caribbean, we covered so much content that was told as a rich and engaging story. Fair warning, a lot of the content is pretty heavy, which Professor Lightfoot fully acknowledges and makes space for. There are also readings assigned for every class that I'd recommend at least skimming, because you will be expected to remember each author's argument for the exams. Overall, I would highly recommend this class as a great way to learn about the history of a region often overlooked or mischaracterized in world history.
I had almost no prior knoweldge on the subject and was intimidated at first because people seemed to have more background knowlege but the course is designed so you can learn the subject from scratch. This class uses a comparative framework, so if you are interested in broader intellectual, economic, and political developments in the new world, this is an ideal seminar to take. You also get to explore a topic of your choice for the final paper, and professor lightfoot is willing to give feedback for your topic. Readings were thoughtfully organized by themes and our section had engaging discussions each week. Professor Lightfoot always presented the material clearly and synthesized the readings well.
I am learning a lot about how to do independent research.
My favorite history course I have taken at Columbia. Many courses on "intellectual history "at Columbia, on celebrated individuals, canonical texts, and seminal "ideas" have given me very little I can apply to the world I inhabit and the contemporary conversations I am implicated in. Comparative Slavery and Emancipation in the Atlantic World taught me more about historiography and present questions of memory and legacy than any other class. Lightfoot's class gave me invaluable insights into the discipline of history, how to find the subaltern in hegemonic archival documents, the eternal ills of capital, the project of decolonization, enduring unfreedoms in society. 1 Columbia University: Arts & Sciences Fall 2021 Course: HISTUN3928_001_2021_3-SLAVERY/ABOLITION-ATLANTCWRLD : HISTUN3928_001_2021_3 - SLAVERY/ABOLITION-ATLANTC WRLD Instructor: Natasha Lightfoot
History of the Modern Caribbean was a pretty good class. The weekly readings were for the most part interesting and Professor Lightfoot's lectures were very clear and focused. The syllabus as a whole developed nicely, giving us a strong understanding of Caribbean history, both specific events and broader trends. To respond to the previous reviewer's statements: the history of the modern Caribbean is in many ways the history of slavery and its legacies, including Black Power. " Yes, Professor Lightfoot is unabashedly liberal but the class is hardly an exercise in anti-white propaganda. However, this class is not easy, even though the reading load is fairly light for a history class. The lectures are intense (she throws a ton at information at you in a class and people usually scrambled to get everything down). The grading is steep too; I consider myself a strong history student and I had to struggle for an A-. She expects a lot on the exams and paper and the TAs (I'm assuming at her instruction) grade to a high standard. It's a fascinating class if you're interested in the subject and Prof Lightfoot is an informative and interesting professor but I would advise against this class if you're looking for an easy way to fulfill your Global Core requirement.
talking points every week (15%, standard coursework postings of 3 or more points that you want to talk about in class about the readings) 2 reading responses (20%, 3 page essays that connect the readings for the week) 15-20 page final paper (55%, topic of your choice) Participation (10%) You have to read(or skim intelligently) everyweek to talk and participate in class. Focus on the larger themes. This class was graded fairly.
I am enjoying it, but definitely would caution anyone considering doing a senior thesis that it is an INSANE amount of work. It is definitely consuming the majority of my semester.
I really had no intention of writing a review, but I had to just to say the person below me is serious need of a whaaaaaaambulance. The class isn't anymore racist than Contemporary Civilization, and if your white guilt is so strong that you're sensitive to potentially incendiary readings, well, perhaps a trip to the psychiatrist is in order. Professor Lightfoot is not around to coddle anyone. That said, I didn't really enjoy the class. I didn't appreciate the format---you're fed a ton of historical facts in lecture, only to learn that you're not really tested on what you know, but how much your TA likes your writing style. On the subject of TAs, they're actually pretty harsh graders. The average grade for both the midterm and the paper was only a B. So this isn't a class where you can do absolutely nothing and expect a good grade. That being said, the class isn't really hard at all. I didn't do most of the readings or study for the midterm/final, and I just got my grade today---A-. Just try to go to at least 70% of the lectures (and bring a laptop---Prof. Lightfoot moves EXTREMELY fast). In all, the material is actually pretty interesting, but I felt that the general structure of the class left something to be desired.
Professor Lightfoot is a decent professor, however be aware that "History of the Modern Caribbean" is not history of the modern caribbean. It is the history of slavery and the oppression of black people in the Caribbean. While I have nothing against that, the class was ill-described, and you should be aware of what you are signing up for. Just a little taste from a required reading: "..If it is anyone who should suffer embarrassment it is the whites. Did black people roast six million Jews? Who exterminated millions of indigenous inhabitants in the Americas and Australia? Who enslaved countless millions of Africans? The white capitalist cannibal has always fed on the worlds black peoples. White capitalist imperialist society is profoundly and unmistakably racist." -from a reading titled "Black Power" Myself, and many others I know would not have taken the class had we known the clear political and racist agenda behind this class. Among other things, Professor Lightfoot claims that "Africans in the West Indies founded the modern banking industry." While such an argument can be made, it is obviously a very narrow viewpoint, and hardly something she should be teaching in "History of the Modern Caribbean". Outside of her personal viewpoint and agenda, the material she covered was very interesting and informative. Unfortunately 85% of the material is her viewpoint...
Prof Lightfoot is SUPER organized, as well as knowledgeable, passionate, interesting and funny. She gets into the real political facts and debates about the Caribbean while also covering the social and cultural changes that occurred and all the reasons and progressions that shaped the Caribbean into what it is today. Great Professor because she is so organized and clear in her presentation, while also being engaging. Only criticism: Class moves slow at first, taking lots of time to explain events in the 18th-19th centuries, so there is less time for more modern history, but she still covers it all pretty well for a survey course.