English And Comparative Literature · Columbia University
Professor Abu-Manneh is one of the best professors I've taken a class with. He is really knowledgeable about the subjects he teaches, and he is also incredibly kind. I encourage his students to go to his office hours, because he will take the time to listen to you, and will offer constructive criticism and positive re-enforcement. Although its been some time since I've taken his class, he remains one of the most influential professors in my college career who has really guided me to do the best work I've done for a class and instilled in me the confidence to excel in all others. He's not a hard grader at all. But he does get upset when students clearly haven't done the reading and no one in class is participating.
I picked his section of Critical Writing completely randomly, and I'm so glad I did. Prof Abu-Manneh is incredibly intelligent, if not altogether wise--he goes on rants about everything from campus problems to middle eastern political conflicts, in a way that is both sensitive and insightful, and hilarious to boot. Despite being a thursday morning class, it was a joy to listen to him go on (sometimes for over an hour), and I left every lecture feeling inspired. That said, this is a very unconventional lit class. There is a minimum of actual 'critical writing', and you read no works of literature directly. Instead he structures each class around one major school of literary theory, with two students presenting readings on it that are largely summaries of the greats (everything from Barthes to Saiid). The class is completely discussion based and sometimes falls flat if your classmates aren't into it (the material is very dense), but he's always willing to slow down and explain tricky points, and is super flexible about the syllabus. He's also very accessible outside of class if you're struggling, and as a previous reviewer said, its totally worth it to drop by just to get to know him--when I was freaking out about the final paper, he basically just told me to chill and it would work out, and it did! If you do the majority of readings you will have a pretty solid background in cr…
I'm not sure I'd recommend this class. The course is nothing like what I expected, and it was extremely one-sided and biased. Granted, there were probably students who were expecting that, but from what the course description said, I think we as students should have been better warned. The literature we read was incredible, but to get to the literature, you had to read long and tedious history books (that got really repetitive really fast). Class discussions (when we had them) were great, but lectures tended to be long and frustrating (Professor Abu-Manneh also has a strange fascination with the phrase "as it were"). All in all, I'm glad I took the course for the perspective it gave me, but unless you're willing to put up with a bunch of dull history and lectures for some amazing literature and class discussion, don't take the class.
The syllabus for this class was amazing-- I read almost every book and it was so worth it. As for Bashir-- at first I thought he was overrated-- but as the semester went by--he won me over. He tends to go on a bit about Marxism, as he is a Marxist scholar, a bit much but for a lecture--this class was great-- Bashir is hilarious, intelligent, and definitely worth getting to know outside of class and if you can, try taking a seminar with him. He is very laid back, down to earth, and genuinely nice.
Not bad at all, the readings are heavy but all recapped in class so you don't have to finish them, and some of them can be redundant. Originally three 5 page essays which he made into one 5 page and one 10 page final essay, no tests, and weekly discussion posts on courseworks (2 paragraphs) to show you read something.
Bashir is undoubtedly one of the best professors at Barnard, and probably the most thought-provoking. He's very passionate and knowledgeable about the subject matter. If you really want an in depth understanding of the matter, no class in the MEALAC department holds a candle to this one. The readings were extremely interesting and informative, and Bashir is a genuinely nice, approachable guy. He'll always take the time to thoroughly address your questions and concerns. I HIGHLY recommend this class!
This class is great! For anyone who appreciates an English class that delves into cultural context and wants to get into real political and social issues, this is definitely worth taking. Bashir is hilarious and always engaging. The discussions, though intellectual and complicated, never fail to amuse. Note that the reading list, despite being considered "global", tends to focus on Arab/African novels.
Bashir is amazing. End of story. This class definitely had the potential to turn into 9am hell filled with lots of petty arguments. Yet, this was almost never the case. Instead, Bashir kept everyone awake and facilitated excellent discussion, despite the early hour. The class is divided into two parts: the first part is mostly historical background with really interesting readings from political scientists, anthropologists, and historians. After this, the class is then dedicated to literature and the occassional film. The syllabus was really excellent, alternated between Israeli and Palestinian authors (both from Israeli and in the diaspora). I loved this class so much that I was inspired to take a grad seminar on Israeli literature with Uri Cohen this semester which, sadly, doesn't hold a candle to Bashir's class.
The Post-Colonial Lit. is fascinating and not too be missed. But I found Bashir to really be a ball-buster.
If I were to teach this course, I would have had us read the "No Nonsense Guide to Globalization" as a primer, and then looked at perhaps a couple chapters of a couple of the books Bashir selected in depth. His book choices (generally) were quite good, but the amount of reading he assigned was completely unreasonable (expensive if you bought it, and troublesome if you didn't), and personally I found myself unable to glean more than the general thesis of each author when there was much good information to be found. Usually these overarching statements propped up Bashir's linear progression of US global domination. As another reviewer noted, there is a lot of economics in this class, which, having never taken an economics class before, I found complicated. When I asked economic questions, both in class and via e-mail, Bashir was not particularly helpful in delineating answers. To his credit, in class sometimes I wasn't very clear on what I did not understand, but, rather than draw out the information, he generally got frustrated and ignored me. When we had to meet with him to write a paper he was always very thoughtful and considerate, but when I came to office hours on other occassions I felt like I had to talk quickly or waste his time. How much of this was my own internalized embarresment, I do not know, but I do know he did not make me feel welcome. This seems to go against…